Mismatches and criminal justice policy: The case of GPS for domestic violence
نویسندگان
چکیده
Mismatches are incongruencies between programmatic policies and working practices that engender counter-productive dynamics or outcomes relative to aspirations. The present article addresses electronic monitoring programs for domestic violence/intimate partner violence, examining how mismatches may emerge during their implementation later. Electronic aim surveil deter defendants facing violence–related charges court-supervised release, with the of enhancing victim safety. Analysis qualitative survey data from a national (US) study suggests violence–focused strategies reliant on surveillance technology be prone generating rooted in discrepancies victims’ expectations, defendant risk profiles, program operations. Policy implications victim-focused initiatives considered.
منابع مشابه
Domestic and Family Violence: Criminal Justice Interventions
DOMESTIC violence is a crime. This has been the key policy statement driving government and community reforms for the past 30 years. Criminalisation responds to the critique of early feminists that the privacy of the family created a screen behind which some men brutalised women and children. Criminalisation seeks to introduce the standards and norms of non-violence in public places, and the me...
متن کاملDomestic Violence and Restorative Justice: Advancing the Dialogue Domestic Violence and Restorative Justice: Advancing the Dialogue
Interest in domestic violence work has been growing for many years in the restorative justice movement, particularly on an academic level. Resources and discussions that connected restorative justice and domestic violence were very few five years ago, but that is changing. Publications such as the collection Restorative Justice and Family Violence (ed. by Strang and Braithwaite), the multi-year...
متن کاملIntuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy
Recent social science research suggests that many if not most judgments about criminal liability and punishment for serious wrongdoing are intuitional rather than reasoned. Further, such intuitions of justice are nuanced and widely shared, even though they concern matters that seem quite complex and subjective. While people may debate the source of these intuitions, it seems clear that, whateve...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Criminology & Criminal Justice
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1748-8958', '1748-8966']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231159364